現代社会では「共同的・土着的コミュニティ」（世代を超え、死者まで含めて祭祀を通じて受け継がれる関係）、「協働的・媒介的コミュニティ」（近隣に暮らす人たちが共通の課題を解決するために協力し合う仕組み）、「仮設的・流動的コミュニティ」（多様な背景を持った人が一時的に形成するつながり）が併存している。伝統的な祭礼には、イエやムラとも呼ばれる共同的・土着的コミュニティが顕在化する。政策や社会運動において重視されてきたのは、地域の共通の課題（ケア、防災、景観など）を協力し合いながら解決する協働的・媒介的コミュニティである。他方で、地理的に離れていても共通の問題意識や趣味を持った人々による、無数の仮設的・流動的コミュニティが生まれては消えている。異質なコミュニティの交錯はしばしばコンフリクトを招く一方で、創発的な変化をもたらすこともある。こうしたダイナミズムを適切にとらえる社会学理論の構築を目指して、文献講読と研究報告を行う。

社会問題・言説を経験的に研究するための理論・方法論の習得を目的とする。前期は、基本文献の購読の後、質的統合法とインタビュー調査（の実習）を行う。後期は、量的調査、テキストマイニングの実習の後、言説の知識社会学アプローチの文献翻訳に加えて、パラグラフ・ライティング実習を行う。受講の条件は、単位取得の有無にかかわらず、開講回数の３／４以上出席し、積極的に発言し、複数回の発表を行うこと。

It has been almost a century since Japan's first trial by jury system (Baishin-seido 1928) was introduced. More than fifteen years have passed since the introduction of Japan's second trial by jury system (Saiban'in-seido 2009). Both of Japan's trial by jury systems were significant but controversial reforms aimed at incorporating citizen participation in criminal trials in order to improve the functioning of the judiciary and overcome its failures to strengthen the rule of law. This seminar will critically examine why these systems were introduced, what functions these systems actually fulfil and how they operate in reality. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach inherent to law and society studies, we will explore the historical, comparative, political and sociological dimensions of Japan’s trial by jury systems, with a particular focus on Japan's unique trajectory. The seminar will begin by tracing the historical development of jury trials in Japan, from early experiments in the late 19th century, through their pre-war implementation (1928-1943), to their post-war revival under US rule in Okinawa (1945-1972). Through this historical lens, we will contextualise Japan's modern Saiban'in system within broader global trends and compare it with jury systems in other jurisdictions. Our discussions will also incorporate contemporary issues, such as political discourses surrounding citizen participation and trends in statistical data, to provide a basis for understanding jury trials both quantitatively and qualitatively. The jury is often hailed as a symbol of democracy and fairness, but it is also criticised for being biased, unpredictable, and unqualified. To assess these claims, we will analyse a range of primary materials - including court decisions, legislative texts, political speeches, and personal accounts - alongside secondary academic readings. Methodological introductions at the beginning of each class will equip students with sociological tools, such as legal consciousness studies and comparative analysis, to critically engage with these materials. In addition, students will conduct interviews with individuals who have participated in jury trials, fostering first-hand insights into the practical realities of citizen participation in legal decision-making. The course will also include guest speakers from a range of legal backgrounds, such as practising lawyers, judges, and NGO representatives, who will provide practical perspectives on the role of the jury in contemporary society. Through our discussions, students will grapple with pressing questions: How do collective social narratives shape perceptions of justice? Why does Japan's criminal justice system resist deeper structural change? How does the interplay between institutional frameworks and cultural values influence jury systems? By the end of the course, students will have developed a nuanced understanding of the jury as a dynamic yet controversial institution. They will be able to analyse the challenges facing the jury in contemporary society, understand the legal rules governing jury trials, and engage with key social science research on jury systems. In addition, students will apply social science theory, research, and methodology to address complex issues surrounding the jury, equipping them with the tools to critically assess its potential and limitations in Japan and beyond.

This course aims to provide first-time learners of economics with solid foundations for understanding introductory macroeconomics. To this end, students will learn basic concepts in macroeconomics, such as GDP, unemployment, inflation, exchange rates and, based on them, how to use workhorse macroeconomic models to analyze consequences of a variety of economic shocks and policy interventions. By taking this course, students are expected to have a deeper understanding of how the macroeconomy functions and be able to critically assess economic news and conventional policy measures.

It has been almost a century since Japan's first trial by jury system (Baishin-seido 1928) was introduced. More than fifteen years have passed since the introduction of Japan's second trial by jury system (Saiban'in-seido 2009). Both of Japan's trial by jury systems were significant but controversial reforms aimed at incorporating citizen participation in criminal trials in order to improve the functioning of the judiciary and overcome its failures to strengthen the rule of law. This seminar will critically examine why these systems were introduced, what functions these systems actually fulfil and how they operate in reality. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach inherent to law and society studies, we will explore the historical, comparative, political and sociological dimensions of Japan’s trial by jury systems, with a particular focus on Japan's unique trajectory. The seminar will begin by tracing the historical development of jury trials in Japan, from early experiments in the late 19th century, through their pre-war implementation (1928-1943), to their post-war revival under US rule in Okinawa (1945-1972). Through this historical lens, we will contextualise Japan's modern Saiban'in system within broader global trends and compare it with jury systems in other jurisdictions. Our discussions will also incorporate contemporary issues, such as political discourses surrounding citizen participation and trends in statistical data, to provide a basis for understanding jury trials both quantitatively and qualitatively. The jury is often hailed as a symbol of democracy and fairness, but it is also criticised for being biased, unpredictable, and unqualified. To assess these claims, we will analyse a range of primary materials - including court decisions, legislative texts, political speeches, and personal accounts - alongside secondary academic readings. Methodological introductions at the beginning of each class will equip students with sociological tools, such as legal consciousness studies and comparative analysis, to critically engage with these materials. In addition, students will conduct interviews with individuals who have participated in jury trials, fostering first-hand insights into the practical realities of citizen participation in legal decision-making. The course will also include guest speakers from a range of legal backgrounds, such as practising lawyers, judges, and NGO representatives, who will provide practical perspectives on the role of the jury in contemporary society. Through our discussions, students will grapple with pressing questions: How do collective social narratives shape perceptions of justice? Why does Japan's criminal justice system resist deeper structural change? How does the interplay between institutional frameworks and cultural values influence jury systems? By the end of the course, students will have developed a nuanced understanding of the jury as a dynamic yet controversial institution. They will be able to analyse the challenges facing the jury in contemporary society, understand the legal rules governing jury trials, and engage with key social science research on jury systems. In addition, students will apply social science theory, research, and methodology to address complex issues surrounding the jury, equipping them with the tools to critically assess its potential and limitations in Japan and beyond.

Diversity in the judiciary plays a vital role in ensuring fairness, enriching judicial decision-making, and fostering public trust in the legal system. This seminar will explore the evolution of diversity within the legal profession, both in Japan and internationally, examine its significance, and discuss the achievements and ongoing challenges in promoting diversity. We will also consider future developments and their potential impacts on the legal field. While this seminar will primarily be conducted in English, students are not required to have an advanced level of English fluency. Discussion in Japanese may be incorporated when necessary to ensure clarity and inclusivity. （必要によって日本語による議論が行われる可能性がある。本トピックに関して英語での演習形式に参加する意欲のある者であれば、どなたでも歓迎する。）

Diversity in the judiciary plays a vital role in ensuring fairness, enriching judicial decision-making, and fostering public trust in the legal system. This seminar will explore the evolution of diversity within the legal profession, both in Japan and internationally, examine its significance, and discuss the achievements and ongoing challenges in promoting diversity. We will also consider future developments and their potential impacts on the legal field. While this seminar will primarily be conducted in English, students are not required to have an advanced level of English fluency. Discussion in Japanese may be incorporated when necessary to ensure clarity and inclusivity. （必要によって日本語による議論が行われる可能性がある。本トピックに関して英語での演習形式に参加する意欲のある者であれば、どなたでも歓迎する。）

大学院における社会学研究および修士論文執筆に必要な、社会学理論に関する基礎的知識の習得を目指す。

この授業では、（教育）社会学に関わる主な社会学理論についての基本文献を講読することを通じて、（教育）社会学的な「ものの考え方」とは何か、それは時代や社会によってどのような拘束性を帯びているか、理論と現実を照らし合わせることによってどのように双方に対して示唆が得られるかを学ぶことを目的とする。

苦悩や痛みは個別の経験ですが、その共有や社会的な承認をいかにするか、それらへのケアや支援をどう構想するかは、社会学の重要な課題の一つです。近年盛んなケア論や、当事者の経験に重点を置く方法への注目はこうした課題に応える中で生まれてきています。本演習ではそれらの研究や、関連するより理論的な研究を読みながら、個人的経験と社会的なものとを関連づける社会学の営みについて考えます。また、講読と並行して各自の研究計画作成・発表等を通じ、問題意識から研究へとつなげていくことも試みます。教員の専門領域周辺（医療・福祉・障害・ケア・逸脱・家族・死生などの社会学）と関連する話題が多くなることが予想されますが、異なる関心を持つ人や他ディシプリンを学ぶ人の参加も歓迎します。