学部後期課程
HOME 学部後期課程 グローバル教養科目(Japanese Philosophy and the Global World)
学内のオンライン授業の情報漏洩防止のため,URLやアカウント、教室の記載は削除しております。
最終更新日:2026年9月17日

授業計画や教室は変更となる可能性があるため、必ずUTASで最新の情報を確認して下さい。
UTASにアクセスできない方は、担当教員または部局教務へお問い合わせ下さい。

グローバル教養科目(Japanese Philosophy and the Global World)

Is there such a thing called Japanese philosophy? While there is a tendency to think of philosophy as uniquely Western, with some developments having sprouts and branches in Indian and Chinese history, what is not as well-known is that there was an original philosophy that emerged out of 20th Century Japan. What we will look at in this course is one strand of Japanese philosophy: the Kyoto School philosophy (京都学派). The Kyoto School is a name given to a philosophical movement that took place around Kyoto University that both assimilated and challenged the foundational claims within Western philosophy by drawing on its own intellectual heritages and ideas and used them to reformulate religious, political, and moral viewpoints that are unique to the East Asian cultural tradition, and perhaps to the rest of the world, while maintaining a dialogue with its Western counterpart. What makes this school important and relevant to contemporary philosophy is the fact they took a bipedal stance between the East and West. The goal for many of these philosophers was not to advance a particular Eastern philosophical standpoint as such, but to put forth a vision of dialogue among a multiplicity of worlds. In this sense, the Kyoto School appears rather cosmopolitan when compared with other European or American schools of thought at that time. Given the increasingly global context we currently live in, it is becoming certain that we need other philosophical discourses that are not Western grounded to further understand the pressures, diversity, and problems of contemporary life. This course will discuss the major figures, principles, and historical controversies of the Kyoto School philosophy and bring these thinkers into conversation within Western philosophy in order to engage the problems of today’s global world. These thinkers shared cosmopolitan visions of the future, seeking to address issues related to colonialism, social conflict, and self/cultural identity; and if we read these thinkers more hermeneutically, we can find that their work touches on issues that afflict us today as well: issues, such as environmental degradation, military escalation, and excess capitalism. Finally, note that this is part I of a sequence of courses I call “The History of Japanese Philosophy” (with part II focusing on the social philosophy of Japanese history and part III on the Marxist tradition within the history of Japanese thought). Ultimately, what this course aims to do is to have students exercise their analytical and critical thinking skills in English by deploying these authors or texts in the service of demonstrating their relevance to the sustainable development goals that is the center of Global Liberal Arts classes (or students can do the opposite, as an option—to disprove their relevance!).
a) know who the major figures of the Kyoto School are;
b) learn the fundamental arguments proposed by leading Kyoto School thinkers;
c) understand and discuss the controversies around the Kyoto School;
d) explore the personal, social, and political issues raised by the Kyoto School;
e) and theorize the possible connections or relevance the Kyoto School has to contemporary problems or issues related to the sustainable development goals
MIMA Search
時間割/共通科目コード
コース名
教員
学期
時限
7V0101048A-PF
FGL-GL3114S3
グローバル教養科目(Japanese Philosophy and the Global World)
Stromback Dennis
A1 A2
火曜5限
マイリストに追加
マイリストから削除
講義使用言語
英語
単位
2
実務経験のある教員による授業科目
NO
他学部履修
開講所属
グローバル教育センター
授業計画
Week 1. Orientation/Introduction to the Course Week 2. Nishida Kitarō – The Early Years: Experience Readings due: Nishida’s Inquiry into the Good (pages: preface-34, 47-54, and 79-83) (this book can be found on Google Classroom) Week 3. Nishida Kitarō – The Early Years and the Middle Years: The Place of Awareness Readings due: Nishida’s Inquiry into the Good (pages: 142-177) (found on Google Classroom) & “Basho” from the book Place & Dialectics (pages: entire essay) (this book can be found on Google Classroom) Week 4. Nishida Kitarō – The Middle Years and the Later Years: Dialectics of Place Readings due: Nishida’s “Logic and Life” (pages: 131-174) from the book Place & Dialectics & “Principles of the New World Order” (pages: entire essay, including the introduction) (both texts are found on Google Classroom) Week 5. Nishida Kitarō – The Later Years (Last Writings): Absolute Contradiction Readings due: Nishida’s Nothingness and the Religious Worldview (pages: 47-109) (this book can be found on Google Classroom) Week 6. Tanabe Hajime – A Critical Response to Nishida Readings due: Tanabe’s Philosophy as Metanoetics, (pages: preface-57) Week 7. Tanabe Hajime – A Critical Response to Nishida Readings due: Tanabe’s Philosophy as Metanoetics, (pages: 82-115 and 255-296) Week 8. Tosaka Jun – The Marxist Critique Readings due: Tosaka Jun’s “Liberalist Philosophy and Materialism,” “Principles of Everydayness and Historical Time” from the book Tosaka Jun: A Critical Reader, “The Logic of Species,” “Is the ‘Logic of Nothingness’ Logic?: On the Method of Nishida Philosophy,” & “Modern Idealism in Disguise,” (the book and the other articles can be found on Google Classroom) Week 9. Nishitani Keiji – The Problem of Nihilism Readings due: Nishitani’s Religion and Nothingness, (pages: 1-61) Week 10. Nishitani Keiji – The Problem of Nihilism Readings due: Nishitani’s Religion and Nothingness, (pages: 77-125 + 250-255 + 284-285) Week 11. Nishitani Keiji – The Self in Social Theory Readings due: Nishitani’s “I and Thou Relationship” and “Awakening of Self in Buddhism,” from The Buddha Eye and “The Problem of Atheism” from Self-Overcoming Nihilism (all articles can be found on Google Classroom) Week 12. Final Presentations Or (depending on the number of students) excerpts from Ueda Shizuteru Week 13. Final Presentations
授業の方法
The philosophical method is different than the methods deployed in the humanities and social sciences. We rely on close readings (not drawing on some theoretical framework to be used as a lens for reading a text) in order to understand the argument of an author, which means that we will follow the argument of the author from A to Z. It is a slow, rigorous, at times boring and difficult process, but one that is rewarding when you fully arrive at the end (of the climb of the mountain) and understand the full extent of the author’s argument (the vista of the landscape). We will extract nuances and hidden meanings, something you don’t get from a standard reading (the readings often done in other disciplines). Humans are lazy readers and philosophy teaches us to awaken out of our reading slumber. What does this mean? This means the following: a) This is not a ‘discussion focused’ class. The epicenter of the class is the text itself, which requires many moments of clarifying passages and contexts. This does not mean that there will be no questions allowed or points of contention or discussion, but rather that philosophical learning is best when you fully understand the arguments of the other interlocutor first. Otherwise, ‘discussions’ often remain flat and unproductive, with few contributing to the discussion, or students just sharing surface level opinions like ‘I like this text. It is interesting.’ Furthermore, we also want to avoid strawman or reductive claims (e.g., cherry picking passages or quotes), which means that… b) …there will be no structured debate in class. This is not a debate class, but a philosophy class, which is about learning the history of arguments. A successful or effective debate can only occur after one fully understands the arguments of the author and then builds their own argument as a theoretical edifice from the ground up. In this class, the goal is more modest: to appreciate the critiques of Japanese philosophers, and to understand the historical dialogue taking place between different philosophical thinkers within and outside Japan. So, this means that… c) 75% of the class will be lecture oriented. Philosophy is not a field where we share ‘our hunches’ but rather learn what philosophers have argued over time. But I will do my best to leave 15-20 minutes at the end of each class period for free discussion.
成績評価方法
【Please check the grading scale that applies to this course. If the Course Code ends without “-P/F”, this is a course with a letter grade (A+, A, B, C, F). If the Course Code ends with “-P/F”, this is a Pass/Fail Course.】 The grading for this course will be broken down into four components: 1. Class Attendance and Participation: 20% 2. Final Paper: 35% 3. Mid-Term Video Reflection: 20% 4. Final Presentation: 25%
履修上の注意
【If the number of students enrolling in this course exceeds the number determined by the instructor, there may be a selection process. Instructions for the selection process will be given in the first class, so if you are interested in taking this course, please be sure to attend the first class.】 There are no prerequisites for this class but some knowledge in philosophy will be useful.