Student performance will be evaluated comprehensively based on assignments and project outputs, documentation and reflection on the learning process, presentation, and active participation in class discussions. Student performance will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
--
Class Engagement: Active and responsible engagement in the learning process
Presentation: Quality and coherence of outcomes and their communication
Exercise (Class work): Ability to connect theory, practice, and values
Reflection: Reflection on depth of exploration, experimentation, and iteration
--
Grades descriptors:
Excellent (A)
Awarded for work that goes beyond standard completion to demonstrate truly outstanding performance. This includes original and well-developed questions, depth of critical thinking, and clear communication of ideas and process.
Good (B)
Awarded for solid and well-developed work that meets the course objectives. Work demonstrates clear understanding of the course's approaches, good collaboration, and effective communication, though may lack the depth, refinement, or originality of A-level work.
Satisfactory (C)
Awarded for work that meets the minimum requirements of the course. Basic engagement with the course's approaches is evident, but outcomes may be underdeveloped, inconsistent, or lacking in clarity, depth, or participation in discussion.
Fail (D)
Awarded where course requirements are not met. This may include insufficient participation, incomplete submissions, or a lack of engagement with the coursework.
Grading Method: in accordance with University of Tokyo regulations, letter grades will be used.