大学院
HOME 大学院 Theory of Transnational Markets and Civil Society IV
学内のオンライン授業の情報漏洩防止のため,URLやアカウント、教室の記載は削除しております。
最終更新日:2024年4月22日

授業計画や教室は変更となる可能性があるため、必ずUTASで最新の情報を確認して下さい。
UTASにアクセスできない方は、担当教員または部局教務へお問い合わせ下さい。

Theory of Transnational Markets and Civil Society IV

POLITICAL TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ASIA-PACIFIC DEMOCRACIES
Claims that democracies such as Australia, Japan and the USA are facing a crisis of citizen trust have grown louder and more widespread in recent years. Fewer and fewer people in democracies seem to trust politicians, political processes and political institutions. Without sufficient levels of trust, so the arguments go, citizens will withdraw from political engagement and governments will have difficulty convincing citizens to comply with public policies. All of this seems to add up to trouble for contemporary democracies, which rely on political cooperation between strangers and public acceptance of the legitimacy of government processes and policies. But is trust in political actors, processes and institutions actually declining in democracies? What do researchers mean when they talk about political trust and distrust? How have they gone about measuring trust and distrust? Even if trust is declining, is that necessarily a bad thing for democracies? Or should we be pleased that citizens are taking a more skeptical view of politicians who do not deserve to be trusted? If declining trust is bad for democracies, what can be done to increase it? Is political distrust more common among some types of citizens (for example, the young) than others?

This postgraduate seminar will explore these questions in a comparative way, focusing on political trust and distrust in democracies in the Pacific region, inclduing Australia, Japan and America. The seminar is divided into four main sections. In the first section, we will explore debates around the definition and concept of trust. In the second section, we will look at recent debates about the relationship between trust, distrust and democracy. In the third section, we will look at empirical studies of citizen trust and its relationship with other political attitudes and behaviours. In the final section, we will look at whether anything can be done to strengthen democracies by increasing levels of political trust, or by directing existing political distrust into healthier forms of skepticism. Please note that we can spend more or less time on each of these four sections according to students’ interests.

Students will engage with these topics via seminar discussions based on academic readings and other source material about political trust and distrust in contemporary democracies. Discussions will compare Australia, the USA, Japan, as well as any other democracies in the Asia-Pacific region that students are particularly interested in. The course will provide an English language teaching environment designed to encourage development of academic reading, writing and analysis skills in English.

Students who complete this course should:
•have an understanding of current debates about trust, distrust and democracy
•be familiar with some methods of comparing democracies
•be familiar with some methods of measuring trust and distrust
•have some knowledge of how trust in Australia compares with other Asia-Pacific democracies.
•be able to undertake written and spoken political analysis in English.
MIMA Search
時間割/共通科目コード
コース名
教員
学期
時限
31D350-0270S
GAS-GS6A27L3
Theory of Transnational Markets and Civil Society IV
SMITH Rodney
S1 S2
水曜2限
マイリストに追加
マイリストから削除
講義使用言語
英語
単位
2
実務経験のある教員による授業科目
NO
他学部履修
開講所属
総合文化研究科
授業計画
Please note that this is an indicative course schedule only. We can spend more or less time on particular topics according to students’ interests. April 10: Introduction and overview [Online Class] April 17: What do we mean when we talk about political trust and distrust? (1) April 24: What do we mean when we talk about political trust and distrust? (2) May 1: Thinking about trust, distrust and democracy (1) In this session and the following two weeks, we will discuss contrasting views about whether trust is necessary for democracy, whether distrust is necessarily bad for democracy, and whether some forms of political trust are better than others for democracy. A key text for discussion in these sessions will be Pippa Norris, In Praise of Skepticism: Trust but Verify (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022). Please read Chapter 1 for this week’s class. May 8: Thinking about trust, distrust and democracy (2) See the description for May 1. May 15: No class May 22: Thinking about trust, distrust and democracy (3) See the description for May 1. May 29: Comparative research on political trust and distrust in Asia-Pacific democracies (1) In this session and the following two weeks, we will critically examine findings from the comparative literature on political trust. We will focus on recent comparative studies of Asia-Pacific countries, such as Chong-Min Park, ‘Political Trust in the Asia-Pacific Region’, in Sonja Zmerli and Tom Van der Meer (eds), Handbook on Political Trust (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017). June 5: Comparative research on political trust and distrust in Asia-Pacific democracies (2) See the description for May 29. June 12: Comparative research on political trust and distrust in Asia-Pacific democracies (3) See the description for May 29. June 19: Comparative research on political trust and distrust in Asia-Pacific democracies (3) See the description for May 29. June 26: Can anything be done to increase trust in democracies? (1) In this session and the following week, we will discuss whether political trust and distrust are determined by psychological or social factors beyond the control of political actors, or whether certain political actors, institutional arrangements and processes can increase levels of political trust. We will again draw on comparative literature, such as Ola Listhaug and Tor Georg Jalkobsen, ‘Foundations of Political Trust’ in Eric M. Uslaner (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). July 3: Can anything be done to increase trust in democracies? (2) See the description for June 26. July 10: Concluding reflections Note on taking questions from students: I am very happy to take questions from students during and after each of the course meetings. There will be opportunities for students to ask questions in the class meetings but students can ask additional questions after the classes.
授業の方法
In the first class in this seminar course on April 10, I will deliver an introductory presentation setting out an overview of the course. There will then be an opportunity for questions in this introductory session and for participants to indicate topics in which they are particularly interested. The other 12 classes will consist of face-to-face seminars covering the topics in the course. In some weeks, I will deliver a short introductory presentation to help start the class discussion. Students may also be asked to make brief presentations on their understanding and response to the readings in some weeks. In some seminars, students will be introduced to online resources and data bases for understanding and researching political trust and distrust. All seminars will include interactive discussions and opportunities for questions. Students are required to prepare for class by completing the set reading for each week before class. The seminar discussions will build on these readings and there will be opportunities to ask questions about them. Further materials will be introduced in classes to help students understand unfamiliar terms and to suggest additional reading for the assessment tasks.
成績評価方法
The two assessment tasks are designed to build student confidence in researching and writing comparative studies of society and politics. The tasks are also designed to encourage progressive development of academic writing in English. Students must write all assessment tasks in their own words (except where they are quoting sources) and not use generative AI tools to help with their assignments. Where students use sources to help them with specific points in their assignments, these must be properly referenced using either Harvard in-text references or footnotes. A bibliography/reference list must be provided at the end of each assignment. Assessment tasks 1. Short critical review of an academic article on political trust. The critical review must summarise the main points of the article and provide a brief critical response to its arguments and/or findings. The word length is 400-500 words. Responses must be written in the students’ own words, except where students quote from the article or other sources. Due: May 8. Worth 25%. Further information will be made available during the Semester. 2. Comparative essay. In this essay, students must compare an aspect of political trust and/or distrust using cases from the Asia-Pacific region. The comparison may focus on any aspect of political trust and/or distrust that we have covered in the course. Students should discuss their ideas for the comparative essay with Professor Smith before they do too much work on the essay. Time will be set aside for this during the Semester. The word length is 2500-2600 words. Responses must be written in the students’ own words, except where students quote and reference other sources. Due: Exam period. Worth: 75%. We will discuss this comparative essay during the Semester.
教科書
There is no textbook to buy for this course. The readings for each week will be available online via the University of Tokyo Libraries, or will be distributed to students before the class. The readings will be chosen partly to reflect the interests of students taking the course. The reading for Week 2 (17 April) is Chapter 1 ‘Two Faces of Trust’, in Pippa Norris, In Praise of Skepticism: Trust but Verify (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022). This reading can be accessed online via the University of Tokyo Library OPAC.
参考書
The following three books will be very useful for this course. Pippa Norris, In Praise of Skepticism: Trust but Verify (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022). Eric M. Uslaner (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). Sonja Zmerli and Tom Van der Meer (eds), Handbook on Political Trust (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).
履修上の注意
This course is designed to help postgraduate students who have an interest in issues of democracy, political trust, citizenship, political attitudes and/or political behavior develop a grounding in some of the relevant literature on these topics. It will approach these questions in a comparative way, using democracies from the Asia-Pacific region as its major focus. (It is likely that students who are interested in these questions in, say, a European context, would still find this course valuable.) The course is taught in English and all required readings and materials are in English. Students will be expected to read, write and speak in English, with learning and further development of these skills a key aim. Students must prepare for each class by doing the required reading before the class. Students are expected to attend classes and participate in discussions and other class activities. Opportunities for participation will be shared fairly among all students. There will be plenty of opportunities for student feedback and suggestions throughout the course and students will be expected to take advantage of these opportunities. In the assignment sfor this course, students will be expected to demonstrate familiarity with the material and questions that we have covered during the Semester and to respond critically to them.
その他
The Week One class (April 10) will be taught online. A Zoom link will be provided. From Week Two onwards, teaching will be in the classroom.