•Berger, Julia (2003), ‘Religious nongovernmental organizations: an exploratory analysis’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 1: 15-39.
•Clarke, Gerard, ‘Religion and international development’, in Jeffrey Haynes,
ed., The Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics (Abingdon 2009), 385-402.
•Etherington, Norman ed. (2008), Missions and Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
•Grove, Richard (1995), Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism 1600–1860 (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press).
•Haynes, Jeffrey, An introduction to international relations and religion (2nd edition, Harlow 2013).
•Philip Jenkins, The next Christendom. The coming of global Christianity (Oxford 2007).
•Klein, Thoralf, ‘The Missionary as Devil. Anti-missionary Demonology in China, 1860-1930’, in Judith Becker and Brian Stanley red., Europe as the Other. External Perspectives on European Christianity (Göttingen 2014), 119–148.
•Maxwell, David and Patrick Harries (eds) (2012), The Spiritual in the Secular. Missionaries and Knowledge about Africa (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company).
•Porter, Bernard, The absent-minded imperialists. Empire, society and culture in Britain
•Porter, Andrew, Religion Versus Empire? British Protestant Missionaries and Overseas
Expansion, 1700-1914 (Manchester, 2004).
•Robert, Dana L. ed. (2008), Converting colonialism: visions and realities in mission history, 1706-1914 (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company).
•Stanley Brian, The Bible and the Flag. Protestant missions and British Imperialism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Leicester, 1990).
•Viswanathan, G., ‘Colonialism and the Construction of Hinduism’, in G. Flood, red., The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism (Oxford 2003), 23-44
•Wilson, Kathleen, ed. A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity, and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660–1840. (New York, 2004).
•Woodberry, Robert D., ‘The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 106/2 (2012): 244-256.