大学院
HOME 大学院 International Relations and Political Regimes
過去(2019年度)の授業の情報です
学内のオンライン授業の情報漏洩防止のため,URLやアカウント、教室の記載は削除しております。
最終更新日:2024年4月1日

授業計画や教室は変更となる可能性があるため、必ずUTASで最新の情報を確認して下さい。
UTASにアクセスできない方は、担当教員または部局教務へお問い合わせ下さい。

International Relations and Political Regimes

The Diffusion and Expansionary Limits of Western International Neoliberal Order
The purpose of this seminar is to familiarize participants with the ongoing developments in international political economy and political science theorizing that is necessary to understand the contemporary developments observed since the mid-1980s.

The three decades since the mid-1980s can be characterized as a period in which political liberalization (i.e. the third wave of democratization) and market liberalization (i.e. economic globalization) have spread geographically, probably to its limits of late. Such parallel changes can be ascribed to newly democratizing regimes adopting open-market economic reforms to promote growth under the auspices of international economic arrangements and organizations. Noteworthy of this process is the fact that: (a) Western developed democracies had pioneered neoliberal economic reforms prior to developing countries; (b) their dominance of international organizations— the GATT-WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank—and use of extensive trade agreements dictated the terms of integration into the global economy by developing economies: and that (c) the diffusion of international neoliberalism was bounded by domestic resistance within developed democracies and international hostility of authoritarian leaders towards open-market reforms and international arrangements dictated by Western democracies.

Ongoing theoretical developments help us understand these closely interrelated developments by providing cues as to: (a) why international businesses within developed democracies the expansion of international arrangements that promote trade and investment, and how such initiatives by developed democracies are hindered by unskilled workers and uncompetitive businesses; (b) how political regimes determine their foreign economic policy as part of their developmental strategy, and why only liberalizing political regimes can credibly commit to open-market reforms requested by developed democracies; and (c) how the spread of Western international arrangements forces illiberal authoritarian leaders to choose between loosening their grip on the economy at the risk of strengthening political challenges or explore revisionary development strategies and seek economic cooperation and security alliances with non-Western regimes.

By reviewing the analytical frameworks that help us answer these questions, this course enables us to understand the aforementioned developments in the global political economy.
MIMA Search
時間割/共通科目コード
コース名
教員
学期
時限
5122206
GPP-MP6P20L3
International Relations and Political Regimes
樋渡 展洋
A1 A2
水曜2限
マイリストに追加
マイリストから削除
講義使用言語
英語
単位
2
実務経験のある教員による授業科目
NO
他学部履修
開講所属
公共政策学教育部
授業計画
I. The Agenda: The Expansion of Western International Liberalism to Its Limits? 1. The Facts: The Spread of Political Liberalization and Economic Globalization 2. The Tools: Democratization, Economic Globalization, and International Arrangements II. How Different Types of Regimes Respond to Economic Globalization 3. Authoritarian Survival and Transition 4. Authoritarian Liberalization and Growth Strategies 5. Democratization and the Growth-Inequality Issue 6. Democratic Consolidation and Reversals III. Dictatorship and Democracy in the Global Economy 7. Political Regimes and International Investment 8. Political Regimes and Capital Mobility 9. Political Regimes and International Agreements 10. Political Regimes and Economic Aid IV. The Consequences of Neoliberal Diffusion   11. The Effect of Economic Aid on Neoliberal Diffusion 12. The Effect of IMF on Neoliberal Diffusion 13. The Effect of Sanctions on Neoliberal Diffusion 14. The Boundaries of Neoliberal Clustering
授業の方法
Apart from its main purpose, this course is also designed to serve as an introduction to international political economy for students not familiar with the field. Although the course is expected to be a seminar, depending on the participants it could be arranged to be more like a TA session that combines a short introduction of the topics before discussing the materials. Each weeks’ readings consist of four articles published in top academic journals. A background in international political economy or in econometrics is not required. Instead, participants are required to have the time and will to do some extra research if necessary to understand the readings. (see below for the first week) The course consists of 14 sessions including the first meeting and the last meeting held during the exam period in its stead.
成績評価方法
Grades will be based on class participation and weekly memos. The participants must distribute a one or two page “discussion memo” to classmates that discusses the assigned materials: the contents, the implications, the problems, and how they related to each other. We will discuss points raised in your memos as well as the topics I prepared in advance, in which everyone is expected to participate actively. The class will be provided in English but is tailored for non-native speakers including Japanese students. 英語の議論に不慣れな学生でも、課題文献の予習などを通して十分授業に参加できるはずである。
教科書
The reading materials are listed in the syllabus, which will be distributed at the first meeting.
参考書
A detailed syllabus with a list of reading assignments will be distributed at the first meeting.
履修上の注意
Participants must skim the following articles beforehand in preparation for the first meeting. 1. Eichengreen, Barry, and David Leblang. 2008. “Democracy and Globalization.” Economics and Politics 20(3): 289-334 2. Milner, Helen V., and Bumba Mukherjee. 2009. “Democratization and Economic Globalization.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 163-181 3. Magaloni, Beatriz, and Ruth Kricheli. 2010. “Political Order and One-Party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123-143 4. Hadenius, Alex, and Jan Torell. 2007. “Pathways from Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy 18(1): 143-156.